Re: [APML] What's Wrong with these Pictures

["Kevin Wigell" <kwemail@twcny.rr.com>]

Bobby Middleton wrote: "Tony Hallas says the film's pretty dead unhypered.
Maybe that's it"

I don't agree, Bobby, but only because I got this image
(http://home.twcny.rr.com/kevinwigell/Deneb_Region.htm) last month with the
same film, unhypered RG200. (If you don't want to follow the link, it's
NGC7000 and lots of other real red stuff.)

I've been away for about a week, so I had missed the RG200 Alert thread. I
just got caught up on that. I see that RG200 was changed in March 2002.
Since I've been doing such a sucky job of keeping track of my film, I don't
know if I bought it after that, but it's quite possible. So maybe I am a
victim of the "unhypered RG200 disaster". Waaah. It would explain the lack
of reds in my latest images.

Back to Supra 400 for me for now I guess.

Kevin Wigell


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>