Re: [APML] What's Wrong with these Pictures?

["Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>]

Tony Hallas says the film's pretty dead unhypered. Maybe that's it.
Bobby M

"For we did not follow cleverly devised tales when
we made known to you the power and coming  of
our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were  eyewitnesses
of His majesty."                                 II Peter 1:16

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Wigell" <kwemail@twcny.rr.com>
To: "APML Discussion List" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [APML] What's Wrong with these Pictures?


> Oops, sorry, no the RG200 was not hypered. Straight out of the box. I'm
not
> sure of the age of the film (yes, I know I need to start keeping better
> track of that), so I'm not sure if it was a new formulation or not. I
> haven't bought any RG200 in several months, though, so my guess would be
> "no".
>
> All my RG200 is between 6 and 12 months old. Yes, I'm going to start
keeping
> track of the film dates better, starting now.
>
> Thanks Bobby.
>
> Kevin Wigell
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>