Re: [APML] What's Wrong with these Pictures?

["Kevin Wigell" <kwemail@twcny.rr.com>]

Oops, sorry, no the RG200 was not hypered. Straight out of the box. I'm not
sure of the age of the film (yes, I know I need to start keeping better
track of that), so I'm not sure if it was a new formulation or not. I
haven't bought any RG200 in several months, though, so my guess would be
"no".

All my RG200 is between 6 and 12 months old. Yes, I'm going to start keeping
track of the film dates better, starting now.

Thanks Bobby.

Kevin Wigell


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>