[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] RG200 Alert

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
From: Joe Pedit <pedit@email.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 12:25:24 -0400
Organization: UNC-CH
References: <006b01c23ddd$217b7140$b6843f42@mpd> <3D512CFF.3006E445@dashmail.net> <3D513A98.4000006@email.unc.edu> <3D5144E7.705D4BF2@aps.anl.gov>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3

Bruce,
The spectral curves for Supra 400 haven't changed. It is a decent 
alternative to Royal Gold 400.
Joe

Bruce Glagola wrote:

> Joe,
> 
> Thanks for posting the curve comparisons.  I shot some Royal Gold 400
> several weeks ago and it had virtually no red response.  In fact, all
> of M20 came out purple at best and NGC7000 barely was there.  I had
> not heard about the change and was quite puzzled by the results. 
> Another "improvement" comes up to bite us.  Last year this film was
> great.
> 
> Bruce



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
  - From: Bruce Glagola <glagola@aps.anl.gov>

References:
- [APML] RG200 Alert
  - From: "westergren" <westergren@netzero.net>
- Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
  - From: Michael Greger <mgreger@dashmail.net>
- Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
  - From: Joe Pedit <pedit@email.unc.edu>
- Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
  - From: Bruce Glagola <glagola@aps.anl.gov>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
Next by Author: [APML] Asteroid 2002 NY40
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
Next by thread: Re: [APML] RG200 Alert
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread