RE: [APML] OK, the film?

["Jeff Ball" <jeffball@netacs.net>]

Hey Scott,
Yes, I have factored in the lab.  I chose the current professional lab based
upon Russ Dickman's analysis of my scans done about one year ago.  At that
time, the lab I chose had nice results with PPF.  I am not aware of any
changes the lab has made in processing.  This leads me to believe that the
grey muck is a result of either the aging of the film or improper storage.
Bottom line, I think that there are other options and this coming new Moon I
am going with some Fuji 100, Kodak 200, and Techpan.

BTW, on a personal note.  I just finished my slide presentation
choreographed with music using Powerpoint.  Powerpoint is quite nice for
this once I figured it out.  Thanks for the inspiration at WSP!

 Thanks
Jeff Ball
>
> I would, though, proffer a thought for your consideration.  How do most of
> you have your PJ400 and other color negative films processed?  At
> your local
> drugstore?  Or at a  professional lab, where chemistry and quality control
> is more rigidly adhered to?  This needs to be factored into
> evaluating color
> shift and other problems.
>
> Scott
>
> website:  http://www.rsiphotos.com/
> email:  ireland@gate.net
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>