[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] ST-4 vs. ST-5 as autoguiders



Steve and Kent,

--- KGKIRKLEY@aol.com wrote:
> The ST-4 is a tried and proven stand alone autoguider.
> If you had trouble with yours, it may have been due to a lack of 
> understanding of how it operates.

You just had to say it, huh? :-) That may have been part of the
problem. But when the ST-4 started guiding my scope all over the sky, I
was pretty sure it wasn't my fault. It did make for some very
intersting exposures though. I know a little more about that stuff
nowadays and I'm willing to forgive and forget.

> I found the manual less than adequate at 
> explaining it's fine points but this is also true of the STV. 

ALL manuals are like that. The STV is not even an option at this time.

> A paper written 
> by Jim Jansuz on the ST-4 makes it all very clear.

I will access that and any other help I can get my hands on.

Thanks guys,
Alan

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo