Re: [APML] Other three shots uploaded

[Alen Koebel <alen_koebel@yahoo.ca>]

Agreed. Not to ignore your other new shots Marco,
but that Veil is particularly stunning. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Heggie
[mailto:stuart.j.heggie@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 9:14 PM
To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
Subject: Re: [APML] Other three shots uploaded


Marco, the Veil is stunning! I love it!
Stuart

Marco Lorenzi wrote:

> Hi all, I have just uploaded other three new shots
to my home page
> (www.astrosurf.com/lorenzi): the Veil Nebula, the
Jewel Box and a very faint
> object, SH2-1 in Scorpius. I also corrected some
bugs I had in my page.
> I hope you will like the pictures. Veil is quite
interesting since I used
> the old Supra 400 that turned out to be amazingly
sensitive to OIII (at
> least compared to all other films I ever tested...)
> The shortcut is
www.astrosurf.com/lorenzi/images/newshot.htm
> Clear skies!
> Marco
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John C. Mirtle" <jmirtle@shaw.ca>
> To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography"
<astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 7:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [APML] M81 revisited
>
> > Excellent Tony! Nicely restrained, a beautiful
image - especially for
> film!
> > No purple cast (which I remember from SHG400) nice
blue arms, pinkish HII
> > regions and a yellow core to boot! On top of that
the detail in the dark
> > lanes is superb and you got a good whiff of
Holmberg 9. What year did you
> > take this?
> >
> > John Mirtle
> > http://members.shaw.ca/jmirtle
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Tony Hallas
> > To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography
> > Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 2:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: [APML] M81 revisited
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >     While the moon is up and the snow and rain are
down, I went digging
> > through old negative sets... I am finding it
almost impossible to match
> the
> > original scans of the PPF 400 ... strange because
I have better equipment
> > and techniques... but it might lend credence to
what I read in my trade
> > journals many years ago... that PPF 400 fades.
This was originally noticed
> > by portrait photographers who were making reprints
from portraits shot a
> > year earlier... the customer returned the reprints
saying they did not
> match
> > the original images... turns out that no matter
what they did, they could
> > not match the original prints. IMHO this is why
Kodak pulled PPF off the
> > market.
> >
> >     So.... I happened upon 3 negatives of M81 shot
with an "A" grade C-14
> on
> > Fuji SHG 400 at f/7 from Mount Pinos back when it
was a dark place...
> these
> > worked quite well and I reprocessed them and added
the image to my web
> > site... I know it does not have the detail of a
CCD, but it has field and
> it
> > also shows this faint blue blob above it that must
be some kind of
> companion
> > like the Magellenic Clouds are to us... only one
real background galaxy
> > showed up... another film vs. CCD difference... I
tried to be a bit
> > restrained in my presentation of the image... have
a habit of going a bit
> > too far at times...
> >
> >     http://www.astrophoto.com/M81.htm
> >
> >     Hope you're having a great weekend,
> >
> >           Tony
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Astro-Photo mailing list
> > Astro-Photo@seds.org
> > http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo


______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo