[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Eta Carinae

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] Eta Carinae
From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:02:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3CCB9815.C5547E2E@earthlink.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020427155108.0275ddb0@pop3.norton.antivirus><5.1.0.14.0.20020427224528.0275f040@pop3.norton.antivirus>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

At 11:35 PM 4/27/2002 -0700, Michael Cole wrote:
>Great work Matt.  

Thanks.

>I see you are still pulling off the PPF stuff.

I wish I'd brought my air drying tube. I expected the RH to be 30-40%, not 70-90%. I think that the humidity in conjunction with the age of this PPF film, fogged it. I've had to do quite a bit of reconstruction, although the Eta raw image wasn't too bad. I think I need to switch over to 400F.
--
Matt BenDaniel
matt@starmatt.com
http://starmatt.com


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- RE: [APML] M51 RGB (more specifics)
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>
- [APML] Eta Carinae
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>
- Re: [APML] Eta Carinae
  - From: Michael Cole <mrcole@earthlink.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Eta Carinae - Try This
Next by Author: [APML] Eta Carinae - Wide
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Eta Carinae
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Eta Carinae
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread