[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Reprocessed Pleiades and M31

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] Reprocessed Pleiades and M31
From: Herm <hermperez@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:56:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <001901c1ec88$a3574f00$8074fea9@d5g2w8>
References: <001901c1ec88$a3574f00$8074fea9@d5g2w8>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

M31 looks as good as it get with E200 film, m45 could use a few more exposures
to stack and bring out detail. the M45 shot appears to have a bit of field
rotation?..
BTW, very nice website you have there. The Megrez seems to do a good job.

"Daniel Reyna" <dreyna14@earthlink.net>  wrote:

>I've reprocessed my images of the Pleiades and M31 from new scans.  
>
>http://home.earthlink.net/~dreyna14/M45.htm
>http://home.earthlink.net/~dreyna14/m31.htm
>
>The Pleiades appears to be a decent improvement in faint detail and a little bit in star images.  You can see more detail in IC1995 to the left.  The M31 shot though provided me with plenty of head-scratching time.  I had to really work with the color and saturation (took me a few hours), but I'm not sure if it looks right.  How do you all work with scans having bland colors?
>
>Daniel


Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- [APML] Reprocessed Pleiades and M31
  - From: "Daniel Reyna" <dreyna14@earthlink.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] 10x20 minutes of the Rosette Nebula from apartment balcony.
Next by Author: [APML] Processing comet
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Reprocessed Pleiades and M31
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Reprocessed Pleiades and M31
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread