Re: [APML] Comet C/2002 C1 (Ikeya-Zhang) (Another One)

["Jim Janusz" <jjanusz@dc.rr.com>]

Hi Loke,

I sent it out to a lab where I know the owner.  She swore that she pushed it
but who knows........

It looks like I should have gone at least 60 minutes, don't think I would
want to push it more than 2x?

Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "lkt" <tan@cox.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Comet C/2002 C1 (Ikeya-Zhang) (Another One)


> Jim,
>
> Nice shot and the tail shows really well. I think PPF 400 is about as
> slow a film one should use for these not so bright comets, especially at
> F/7. Yes, E100 is really slow, its hard to get anything at all on it.
> Did you process the E100 yourself or was it sent out?
>
> Loke
>
>
>
> Jim Janusz wrote:
> >
> > Here's another image from the last weekend.  It's from the Traveler
105EDF,
> > 30 minutes on un-hypered PPF with the Pentax 67 Camera.
> >
> > http://www.astroimager.net/Page-105-14.html
> >
> > I had shot two images with the 180 EDF and 4x5 Kodak E100 SW.  I exposed
> > them 30 minutes at F7 and pushed 2x.  The results were awful.  The
> > transparencies are very dark, under exposed, even when pushed two stops.
> > Bummer.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >  Astronomy  Web Page at:
> >  http://www.astroimager.net/
> >
> > --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
> >              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>