[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Mission Statement Change?
Mike I feel the best solution is to keep one list with the focus directed
towards film but allowing ccd topics that can be related to techniques used
for film. Pretty much what we've been having except a little more on-topic
with the CCD posts. Let's don't "divide and conquer" <g>
Bobby Middleton
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike halderman" <astro@mrh.org>
>
> Do you think a new
> list would be good or bad for APML?
>
> -mike
>
>
> "Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com> writes:
> >
> > The point I attempt to make along with several others is that this
> > is a film astro-imaging list; the only one there is. And I believe
> > most, if not all posts should point in the end to that theme. My
> > feelings are that if the post has no relevance whatsoever to a
> > film theme then one of the CCD groups would be a more appropriate
> > forum. But I'll be here no matter what discission is made. I've
> > been deleting lots of CCD posts and I've been reading lots too. I
> > can continue to do the same. But in my mind, the course we were on
> > will turn this list into more a CCD list than a film list. That's
> > my concern since there are no other film lists.
> >
> > Bobby Middleton
> >
>
> -- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
> Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
-- APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/> ---
Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>