Re: [APML] Mission Statement Change?

[mike halderman <astro@mrh.org>]

I'd host an "astro-image processing" list (or something like that) if 
that would help.  APML could be kept for film only.  Do you think a new
list would be good or bad for APML?

-mike


"Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com> writes:
>
>   The point I attempt to make along with several others is that this
>   is a film astro-imaging list; the only one there is. And I believe
>   most, if not all posts should point in the end to that theme. My
>   feelings are that if the post has no relevance whatsoever to a
>   film theme then one of the CCD groups would be a more appropriate
>   forum. But I'll be here no matter what discission is made. I've
>   been deleting lots of CCD posts and I've been reading lots too. I
>   can continue to do the same. But in my mind, the course we were on
>   will turn this list into more a CCD list than a film list. That's
>   my concern since there are no other film lists.
>
>   Bobby Middleton 
>

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>